Skip to main content
National Cancer Institute

Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration

Edit resource

Mansilla V. Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration. 2006.

How does one ascertain the quality of interdisciplinary work, when criteria from individual disciplines do not suffice? Assessment is one of the most important and least understood aspects of interdisciplinary research. An empirical study of interdisciplinary work in five established research institutions, reveals that experts prioritize peer review, journal prestige, citation patterns, and successful patent filing, as indicators of quality interdisciplinary work, while also viewing these indicators with skepticism. Three epistemic criteria to assess interdisciplinary work are revealed: (1) the degree to which new insights relate to antecedent disciplinary knowledge in multiple disciplines involved, (2) the sensible balance reached in weaving disciplinary perspectives together, and (3) the effectiveness with which the integration of disciplines advances understanding and inquiry. These criteria may inform the task of reviewers and evaluators of interdisciplinary research outcomes by attending to some of the unique epistemic demands that this type of work presents.

Online at:



Type of Publication:



interdisciplinary work, quality of work

Addresses these goal(s):

  • Conduct research on/evaluate team science

Comments (0 comments)

Add Comments
Resource created by Amanda Vogel on 3/24/2011 4:36:28 PM.

Narrow your search by
resource type or goal:

Advanced Search



Email this page