Skip to main content
National Cancer Institute

Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact

Editor Pick Icon Editor's Pick for: Stephen M. Fiore

Edit resource

Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science. 2013 Oct 25;342(6157):468-472.

Novelty is an essential feature of creative ideas, yet the building blocks of new ideas are often embodied in existing knowledge. From this perspective, balancing atypical knowledge with conventional knowledge may be critical to the link between innovativeness and impact. Our analysis of 17.9 million papers spanning all scientific fields suggests that science follows a nearly universal pattern: The highest-impact science is primarily grounded in exceptionally conventional combinations of prior work yet simultaneously features an intrusion of unusual combinations. Papers of this type were twice as likely to be highly cited works. Novel combinations of prior work are rare, yet teams are 37.7% more likely than solo authors to insert novel combinations into familiar knowledge domains.

Online at:



Type of Publication:

Journal article


atypical combinations, teams, science, innovativeness, impact, scientific collaboration

Addresses these goal(s):

  • Learn about the field of team science: history, theory and concepts
  • Provide training for team science to team members or students

Comments (0 comments)

Add Comments
Resource created by Elizabeth Manzella on 7/30/2014 4:47:04 PM.

Narrow your search by
resource type or goal:

Advanced Search



Email this page