Skip to main content
National Cancer Institute

Assessing the Value of Team Science: A Study Comparing Center- and Investigator-Initiated Grants

Editor Pick Icon Editor's Pick for: Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Stephen M. Fiore, Kara L. Hall

Edit resource

Hall K, Stokols D, Stipelman B, Vogel A, Feng A, Masimore B, Morgan G, Moser R, Marcus SE, Berrigan D. Assessing the Value of Team Science: A Study Comparing Center- and Investigator-Initiated Grants. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012 Feb;42(2):157-163.

Background: Large cross-disciplinary scientific teams are becoming increasingly prominent in the conduct of research. Purpose: This paper reports on a quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted to compare bibliometric indicators of scientific collaboration, productivity, and impact of center-based transdisciplinary team science initiatives and traditional investigator-initiated grants in the same field. Methods: All grants began between 1994 and 2004 and up to 10 years of publication data were collected for each grant. Publication information was compiled and analyzed during the spring and summer of 2010. Results: Following an initial lag period, the transdisciplinary research center grants had higher overall publication rates than the investigator-initiated R01 (NIH Research Project Grant Program) grants. There were relatively uniform publication rates across the research center grants compared to dramatically dispersed publication rates among the R01 grants. On average, publications produced by the research center grants had greater numbers of coauthors but similar journal impact factors compared with publications produced by the R01 grants. Conclusions: The lag in productivity among the transdisciplinary center grants was offset by their overall higher publication rates and average number of coauthors per publication, relative to investigator-initiated grants, over the 10-year comparison period. The findings suggest that transdisciplinary center grants create benefits for both scientific productivity and collaboration.

Online at:



Type of Publication:

Journal article


evaluation, productivity, collaboration, center grants, federal funding

Addresses these goal(s):

  • Learn about the field of team science: history, theory and concepts
  • Establish or maintain effective team science endeavors
  • Enhance team performance, interactions, and attitudes
  • Provide institutional support for team science
  • Conduct research on/evaluate team science

Comments (1 comments)

Add Comments

Open Access and CME Credits Available on the American Journal of Preventive Medicine Website, Monday, February 6, 2012 2:02:35 PM

This article is available through open access on the website of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. There is a related activity available online for CME credit.

Resource created by Amanda Vogel on 2/6/2012 1:55:24 PM.

Narrow your search by
resource type or goal:

Advanced Search



Email this page